![[DC 280 Camera]](http://www.kodak.com/US/images/en/digital/cameras/dc280/dc280TitleImage.gif)
Go to the Official Web Page
| CCD |
2.3 Megapixels Max resolution: |
This is a high-end consumer digital camera, at a fraction of the cost of professional DC's (5 Megapixel CCDs) |
| Cost | About $599 (was $7-800) |
Professional DC's cost anywhere from $2-10,000. Considering it is 40% the CCD versus 35% of the cost for the low-end professional model, I'm satisfied, having purchased this as my first digital camera. You should be able to find this camera online for significantly less than the MSRP. I purchased my camera from www.ecost.com with no issues or hassles that other online resalers may put you through. |
| "Digital Film" Media | 20MB CompactFlash card |
SmartMedia is a smaller media, however it is more prone to damage by static or mild abuse. CompactFlash is more durable, and can be found in much larger storage sizes than SmartMedia. Luckily, my DC280's package contained a 32MB CompactFlash card, which stores about 55 High Quality images. I'm guessing this was due to recent production facility problems overseas. |
| Connectivity | Computer: USB & Serial TV: NTSC/PAL Video Out |
Adapters for both USB, PC Serial and Macintosh Serial connections are provided. USB is very important, since serial connections are much slower than 10 |
| Size | 5.2"w x 2.0"d x 3.0"h | It's not quite pocket-able. You'll want a carry case for the accessories anyhow. (ie. the TV-Video Out cable, extra CompactFlash Media and possibly extra batteries.) |
| Weight | 12.1oz without batteries | The total weight with batteries is equivalent to two Universal Remotes stacked on top of eachother. |
| Zoom | 6x : 2x optical, 3x digital. |
The better the optical zoom, the clearer long-distance images will remain when telephoto zoom is used. This camera has auto-focus that may be adjusted for multi-point or single-point focusing. I have only encountered problems with auto-focus in low light, low battery, and when the subject is wearing very dark colors. |
| Focal length | 30-60m (35mm camera equivalent) | |
| Actual Focal length | 6.5-13mm | This is the actual distance between the lenses and the CCD. |
| Aperture | Wide: F/3 Telephoto: F/3.8 |
|
| Focus Distance | 1.6ft to infinity | |
| Macro Focus Distance | 0.82ft to 1.6ft | The smaller the macro focus distance,
the clearer extremely close images will appear. The best macro
consumer DC right now is made by Ricoh. For instance, a macro focus distance of 1.5" to 1.6ft would allow you to photograph the fine hairs on a caterpillar or the details of the face of a quarter. |
| Power |
A/C: A DC power converter is not provided in the package. Batteries: Kodak provides 4 AA Alkalines so you may start taking pictures right away, and 4 AA NiMH batteries with a 8hr charger. |
After 40-50 pictures with about 30 seconds of LCD usage, will drain the batteries. Flash usage also decreased battery life. Good thing they provide a charger & NiMH batteries. So far, I've taken 135 pictures after using the original 4 AA alkalines and one full 8hr charge of the 4 AA NiMH; and only now it is telling me the batteries are low.(That's about 67 pictures per 4 AA batteries so far.) The AC->DC power adapter would be essential if you were to present the screen show feature on a TV for a long period of time, or if you plan to do a great deal of photographing, so you may use the adapter when downloading/uploading from/to the camera. |
The Kodak DC280's user interface is the easiest I have found to use. Olympus and Ricoh both had fairly unfriendly user interaction. However, with some memory work, those cameras should not be too difficult to master.
The factors weighted heaviest in my decision were Macintosh and PC support, maximum resolution of at least 1600x1200, USB connectivity, at least 2x optical zoom, CompactFlash Media support, a fair sized handgrip (preferably pocket-able size), then battery life & better comparable cost versus similar cameras.
I noticed a few which offered 30-120second video/audio sampling at a very reduced image resolution. If you consider this a feature, you might like it. However, if you're serious about digital video recording, forget the camera and go for a real digital camcorder instead (about $1000-1800 for consumer DV models).
I always take pictures at the highest quality then downsample them aken with a Kodak DC280. All pictures are taken at the highest quality (1760x1168), then cropped and/or downsampled to1024x680 for my albums.
I have only noticed some grain in the images from the high quality pictures. This appears to be due to JPEG compression factor that Kodak uses at even the "Best" JPEG quality, or possibly CCD sampling issues. I only wish there were an uncompressed image capture, so I might figure out who's at fault.
However, when bilinear or bicubic interpolated from 1760x1168 to 1024x680, the images clearly beat any 1024x camera available. Then again, in all image processing, typically oversample by 1.5-2 times your destination's resolution for marginally better image quality.
(C)opyright 2000 Michael R. Bytnar (m-bytnar@uiuc.edu)
Image linked from Kodak's website. (C)opyright Kodak.